Competition tables
Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | WR*1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Riverbank (SNR CRI) | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
2. John Palmer (SNR CRI) | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 86% |
3. Schofields (SNR CRI) | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 71% |
4. Northbourne (SNR CRI) | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 71% |
5. Galungara (SNR CRI) | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 71% |
6. Rouse Hill (SNR CRI) | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 63% |
7. Ironbark Ridge (SNR CRI) | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 57% |
8. North Kellyville (SNR CRI) | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 43% |
9. Kellyville Ridge (SNR CRI) | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 29% |
10. Kenthurst (SNR CRI) | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 29% |
11. Quakers Hill East (SNR CRI) | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 19% |
12. Parklea (SNR CRI) | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 19% |
13. Riverstone (SNR CRI) | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0% |
The competition table is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
competition tables. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.