Ridges PSSA
Competition tables
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Ironbark Ridge (SNRS NET) | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 2. Northbourne (SNRS NET) | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 93% |
| 3. Rouse Hill (SNRS NET) | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 88% |
| 4. John Palmer (SNRS NET) | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 79% |
| 5. Schofields (SNRS NET) | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 63% |
| 6. Quakers Hill East (SNRS NET) | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 57% |
| 7. Kenthurst (SNRS NET) | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 43% |
| 8. Oakville (SNRS NET) | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 38% |
| 9. Kellyville Ridge (SNRS NET) | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 36% |
| 10. North Kellyville (SNRS NET) | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 31% |
| 11. Parklea (SNRS NET) | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 14% |
| 12. Riverbank (SNRS NET) | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 13% |
| 13. Riverstone (SNRS NET) | 7 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0% |
The competition table is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
competition tables. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
Partners
