Competition tables
Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | WR*1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Rouse Hill (SNRS NET) | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
2. Ironbark Ridge (SNRS NET) | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
3. John Palmer (SNRS NET) | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
4. Northbourne (SNRS NET) | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
5. Schofields (SNRS NET) | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 75% |
6. Quakers Hill East (SNRS NET) | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 67% |
7. Kellyville Ridge (SNRS NET) | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 33% |
8. North Kellyville (SNRS NET) | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 25% |
9. Kenthurst (SNRS NET) | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 25% |
10. Oakville (SNRS NET) | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 25% |
11. Riverbank (SNRS NET) | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 25% |
12. Parklea (SNRS NET) | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0% |
13. Riverstone (SNRS NET) | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0% |
The competition table is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
competition tables. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.