Competition tables
Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Bonus | Points | WR*1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. United White U12s | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 33 | 9 | 24 | 0 | 26 | 87% |
2. United Maroon U12s | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 5 | 22 | 0 | 25 | 100% |
3. Harlies Sherbies U12s | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 21 | 84% |
4. Harlies Pineapples U12s | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 19 | 76% |
5. Harlies Jelly Beans U12s | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 68% |
6. Harlies Smarties U12s | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 22 | -9 | 0 | 16 | 53% |
7. ESC U12s | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 0 | 14 | 47% |
8. Guyra U12s | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 0 | 13 | 52% |
9. NEGS U12s | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 19 | -18 | 0 | 12 | 40% |
10. PLC U12s | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 29 | -26 | 0 | 7 | 28% |
11. TAS U12s | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 0 | 4 | 20% |
The competition table is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
competition tables. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.