Hills Softball Association
View ladder
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Redsox C | 15 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 150 | 98 | 52 | 23 | 77% |
| 2. Hahndorf C | 15 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 162 | 103 | 59 | 20 | 67% |
| 3. Macclesfield C | 15 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 115 | 148 | -33 | 15 | 50% |
| 4. Strathalbyn C | 15 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 105 | 127 | -22 | 14 | 47% |
| 5. Pirates C | 15 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 115 | 113 | 2 | 12 | 40% |
| 6. Echunga C | 15 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 70 | 128 | -58 | 6 | 20% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
Sponsors
slide 1 to 2 of 2
We Support
