Hills Softball Association
Ladders
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Redsox C | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 22 | 29 | 10 | 100% |
| 2. Macclesfield C | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 30 | 1 | 6 | 75% |
| 3. Hahndorf C | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 49 | 34 | 15 | 6 | 60% |
| 4. Strathalbyn C | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 22 | 25 | -3 | 4 | 40% |
| 5. Echunga C | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 31 | -18 | 2 | 20% |
| 6. Pirates C | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 35 | -24 | 0 | 0% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
Sponsors
We Support
