Ladders
Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Hale | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 29 | 11 | 18 | 19 | 90% |
2. Mods | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 13 | 72% |
3. Black Ducks | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 | 67% |
4. Guildford | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 7 | 47% |
5. Harlies | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 7 | 47% |
6. YMCC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 4 | 27% |
7. Raiders | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 4 | 27% |
8. Whitford | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 4 | 27% |
9. Knights | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 18 | -2 | 4 | 22% |
10. Kal & Co | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 2 | 11% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.