Ladders
| Team | Played | Wins | Losses | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Tan-Li(A) | 10 | 8 | 2 | 31 | 19 | 12 | 32 | 80% |
| 2. Cunningham-Zhang | 10 | 6 | 4 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 24 | 60% |
| 3. Shi-Lyu | 10 | 5 | 5 | 28 | 22 | 6 | 20 | 50% |
| 4. Strong(B)-Chikhale | 10 | 5 | 5 | 22 | 28 | -6 | 20 | 50% |
| 5. Tooronga Zoo | 10 | 4 | 6 | 26 | 24 | 2 | 16 | 40% |
| 6. Stevens-Pilz | 10 | 2 | 8 | 18 | 32 | -14 | 8 | 20% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
Partners
We Support
