Ladders
| Team | Played | Wins | Losses | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Tan-Li(A) | 7 | 6 | 1 | 23 | 12 | 11 | 24 | 86% |
| 2. Tooronga Zoo | 7 | 4 | 3 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 16 | 57% |
| 3. Strong(B)-Chikhale | 7 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 17 | 1 | 16 | 57% |
| 4. Shi-Lyu | 7 | 3 | 4 | 18 | 17 | 1 | 12 | 43% |
| 5. Cunningham-Zhang | 7 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 21 | -7 | 12 | 43% |
| 6. Stevens-Pilz | 7 | 1 | 6 | 11 | 24 | -13 | 4 | 14% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
Partners
We Support
