Ladders
| Team | Played | Wins | Losses | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Tan-Li(A) | 4 | 4 | 0 | 17 | 3 | 14 | 16 | 100% |
| 2. Tooronga Zoo | 4 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 12 | 75% |
| 3. Shi-Lyu | 4 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 | 50% |
| 4. Strong(B)-Chikhale | 4 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 8 | 50% |
| 5. Cunningham-Zhang | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 4 | 25% |
| 6. Stevens-Pilz | 4 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 0 | 0% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
Partners
We Support
