Ladders
| Team | Played | Wins | Losses | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Bansal-Burns | 3 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 100% |
| 2. Sengupta-Babaei | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 67% |
| 3. Emam-Toosi | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 67% |
| 4. Goodwin-Wang | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 8 | 67% |
| 5. Floyd-Salgueiro | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 0 | 0% |
| 6. Haughton(L)-Bignell | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 0 | 0% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
Partners
We Support
