Ladders
| Team | Played | Wins | Losses | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Bansal-Burns | 7 | 5 | 2 | 22 | 13 | 9 | 20 | 71% |
| 2. Goodwin-Wang | 7 | 5 | 2 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 71% |
| 3. Sengupta-Babaei | 7 | 4 | 3 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 16 | 57% |
| 4. Emam-Toosi | 7 | 4 | 3 | 19 | 16 | 3 | 16 | 57% |
| 5. Haughton(L)-Bignell | 7 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 24 | -13 | 8 | 29% |
| 6. Floyd-Salgueiro | 7 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 22 | -9 | 4 | 14% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
Partners
We Support
