Ladders
| Team | Played | Wins | Losses | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Bansal-Burns | 10 | 8 | 2 | 33 | 17 | 16 | 32 | 80% |
| 2. Goodwin-Wang | 10 | 7 | 3 | 29 | 21 | 8 | 28 | 70% |
| 3. Sengupta-Babaei | 10 | 5 | 5 | 26 | 24 | 2 | 20 | 50% |
| 4. Emam-Toosi | 10 | 4 | 6 | 24 | 26 | -2 | 16 | 40% |
| 5. Floyd-Salgueiro | 10 | 3 | 7 | 21 | 29 | -8 | 12 | 30% |
| 6. Haughton(L)-Bignell | 10 | 3 | 7 | 17 | 33 | -16 | 12 | 30% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
Partners
We Support
