Ladders
| Team | Played | Wins | Losses | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Qin-Pilz | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 100% |
| 2. Stevens-Bellamy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 100% |
| 3. Haughton-Freibothe | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 100% |
| 4. Wagner-YenerKorematsu | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 0% |
| 5. Newfield-Fung | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 0% |
| 6. Cunningham(B)-Cauchi(E) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 | 0% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
Partners
We Support
