Barossa Valley Squash Club (at the Rex)
Standard ladder
| Team | Played | Wins | Losses | Forfeits | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Whiting | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 22 | 92% |
| 2. Herring | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 27 | 17 | 10 | 18 | 82% |
| 3. Snook | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 20 | 24 | -4 | 10 | 45% |
| 4. Mulloway | 11 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 18 | 26 | -8 | 4 | 18% |
| 5. Garfish | 11 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 29 | -14 | 2 | 9% |
| 6. Bye | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
| Garfish | Snook | Mulloway | Whiting | Herring | Bye | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garfish |
Snook won!
1-7-205 — 3-10-215
|
TBD
|
Whiting won!
3-11-238 — 1-7-226
|
Herring won!
1-4-151 — 3-9-177
|
TBD
|
|
| Snook |
Snook won!
1-7-205 — 3-10-215
|
Snook won!
3-10-214 — 1-5-183
|
Whiting won!
1-6-204 — 3-10-222
|
TBD
|
TBD
|
|
| Mulloway |
TBD
|
Snook won!
3-10-214 — 1-5-183
|
Whiting won!
1-3-132 — 3-10-181
|
Herring won!
2-7-183 — 2-7-179
|
TBD
|
|
| Whiting |
Whiting won!
3-11-238 — 1-7-226
|
Whiting won!
1-6-204 — 3-10-222
|
Whiting won!
1-3-132 — 3-10-181
|
Herring won!
2-6-170 — 2-7-166
|
TBD
|
|
| Herring |
Herring won!
1-4-151 — 3-9-177
|
TBD
|
Herring won!
2-7-183 — 2-7-179
|
Herring won!
2-6-170 — 2-7-166
|
TBD
|
|
| Bye |
TBD
|
TBD
|
TBD
|
TBD
|
TBD
|